Confusion about BRCA 1 gene What medicine did not say to Angelina Jolie? |
|
You've probably heard of the decision of Angelina Jolie, who underwent mastectomy after she found out that she tested positive for the BRCA1 genetic mutation.
Is famous actress familiar with the whole truth about the BRCA1 gene and its risk of breast cancer development?
Modern medicine claims that the aforementioned gene increases the chances of developing breast or ovarian cancer by 87%
But is this really the truth?
Connection between cancer and BRCA mutations is not yet scientifically validated
U.S. National Cancer Institute (NCI) on its website gives the following statement, which might upset Angelina Jolie and other victims of propaganda against the BRCA 1 gene,:
"It is important to note, however, that most research related to BRCA1 and BRCA2 has been done on large families with many individuals affected by cancer. Estimates of breast and ovarian cancer risk associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations have been calculated from studies of these families.
Because family members share a proportion of their genes and, often, their environment, it is possible that the large number of cancer cases seen in these families may be due in part to other genetic or environmental factors. Therefore, risk estimates that are based on families with many affected members may not accurately reflect the levels of risk for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers in the general population.
In addition, no data are available from long-term studies of the general population comparing cancer risk in women who have harmful BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations with women who do not have such mutations. Therefore, the percentages given above are estimates that may change as more data become available."
I hope you realize the absurdity of that statement.
In fact, the NCI openly states that the risk of cancer may depend on a number of genetic and environmental factors.
Simply put, the NCI does not really know how BRCA mutations are associated with increased risk of cancer development.
There are no data from long-term studies of women with BRCA mutations.
Therefore, it is concluded by the NCI, increased percentage of cancer risk is only an estimate, which needs to be confirmed by additional research.
Genes do not seal our fate
Do you have a BRCA mutation; you do not have to be scared.
Genes do not seal our fate. Your health depends on your lifestyle.
Gene expression (their behavior) depends on your lifestyle, food and exposure to toxins.
In May of this year, a Healing Summit was held, a gathering at which experts share opinions about genetics and cancer prevention.
Dr. John Aspley said that food directly affects our genes. If we eat contaminated food from the toxic environment, our genes will produce disease.
Dr. Aspley said, "with proper diet and clean environment, genes will always produce resistant and healthy cells, never cancer cells."
"If we do not learn that, we will have to amputate most of the body parts. My heart hurts for Angelina and I wish her all the best, "he added.
Natural counterbalance to BRCA mutation
You can neutralize the harmful effect of genetic mutations if you adopt these natural and non-invasive ways of preventing cancer.
Taking vitamin D is the simplest way to reduce the risk of breast cancer development, even for those who carry the aforementioned mutated gene.
Research conducted by Dr. Susana Gonzalo has shown that this vitamin plays an important role in preventing the activation of the mutated BRCA1 gene.
There are other nutrients that oppose cancer.
In the medical journal Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, the results of the Polish research on the preventive role of the mineral selenium were published.
Research has shown that taking selenium minerals at a dose of 276 mcg per day for a period of one to three months significantly reduces cell damage in women with a BRCA1 mutation, compared to women who did not receive this mineral.
Selenium is therefore also a good preventive measure for women who carry a mutated BRCA1 gene.
Further studies have suggested a beneficial effect of omega 3 fatty acids.
Since vitamin D, selenium, and healthy fatty acids reduce the risk of breast cancer, taking these ingredients sounds better than spending thousands of dollars on genetic testing and performing radical surgery.
However, conventional medicine and the media with which it cooperates are reluctant to publish these facts, because the sale of vitamins, minerals and fatty acids will not them bring billions in revenues.
Only a well-informed person can distinguish truth from which pharmaceutical medicine is using against us.
Sources for this article include:
[url=http://www.naturalnews.com/040394_BRCA1_breast_cancer_gene_mutations.html]http://www.naturalnews.com/040394_BRCA1_breast_cancer_gene_mutations.html[/url]
[url=http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/BRCA]http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/BRCA[/url]
[url=http://www.alternativa-za-vas.com/index.php/clanak/article/informoterapija]http://www.alternativa-za-vas.com/index.php/clanak/article/informoterapija[/url]
Liked the article?
Share it with your friends!
